|Power consumption||2000 watts|
|Suction power||420 watts|
|Dust collector||3 l bag / cyclone filter|
|Power controller||on the body|
|Fine filter||there is|
|Noise level||83 dB|
|Power cord length||7 m|
|Functions and features||dust bag full indicator, auto winding of the power cord, footswitch on / off. on the body|
|Vacuum cleaner dimensions (WxDxH)||25.8x43.5x29.6 cm|
|Additional Information||HEPA 13 filter; action radius 10m|
|Tubes and nozzles|
|Additional tips included||floor / carpet NB300; crevice; small with a brush; for furniture cleaning; pet hair brush (TB250)|
Samsung SC20F30WE Vacuum Cleaner Reviews
- - very powerful
- - bag + cyclone (need to change bags 1-2 times a year, 1 bag - 80 p.)
- - beautiful design, bright and glossy (dust is not visible on it)
- - better plastic (than the VCJG248H)
- - more compact brush (compared to VCJG248H)
- - only one latch (in VCJG248H - three, and in each backlash, the entire system of the handle-cyclone-pipe-brush because of this much loose)
- blowing air up is not very pleasant (SC5356 - back)
- too long grip, once nearly knocked her things off the table when he turned his back (compared to SC5356)
- quite noisy
- there is no regulator on the handle (compared to SC5356), this is partly compensated by a movable damper, which can be opened if you need to quickly increase the pressure in the pipe
- misalignment of the handle and the tube (unlike SC5356), you need to get used to
- hose material too soft, may be bent (compared to SC5356)
Almost all of the advantages and disadvantages are described in comparison with counterparts from Samsung: SC5356 (not on sale, the best vacuum cleaner I have ever seen) and VCJG248H (in some parameters inferior to this).
Vacuum cleaners only with a bag or only with a container I will never buy again - the first ones are too expensive and require frequent maintenance, the second one constantly needs to wash some filters, which takes a lot of time. Therefore, when buying a choice was very small. Other companies, besides Samsung, disappeared almost immediately - either the price is too high or the power is very low. In addition, I know from experience that these Koreans can do vacuum cleaners. Prior to that, I used a similar SC5356 machine for many years, and if I had not broken it myself, I would have used it further. Unfortunately, the same was no longer found, so I chose the one closest in parameters. I was satisfied with the choice; today (autumn 2014) this is most likely the best vacuum cleaner on the market.
Anonim 2014-10-19 Evaluation 5
- Hybrid from cyclone and bag. Nice. Bumper. Maneuverable.
- Serious has not yet been identified. Perhaps the cyclone filter attached to the handle will deliver any inconvenience, but now the joints are rastroili, only one with a latch, the other two are ordinary.
It is too early to draw conclusions, but before buying, I did not find any reviews, I will leave the first impression. This vacuum cleaner is for those who doubt the choice between the cyclone and the dust bag. The flask of the cyclone filter, though small, is easily and simply freed from debris, much simpler than many other systems, and it is also easy to clean. Large dirt and dust do not fall into the bag, which will probably prolong its service life. Hepa filter from the inside remained crystal clear, while little dust was collected, but the tendency is a pleasant, clean cyclone filter, would leave it gray.
Belmesov Yuri, 2014-08-16 Evaluation 5
- The vacuum cleaner is just a bomb! When weekly cleaning odnushki (I do not use a broom), the bag has to be changed every six months. All the main large garbage in the flask. The flask is made quite reliably.
- Attaching the filter to the lower tube could also be on the latch. but it doesn't matter.
I recommend it to everyone, I bought it for my mom after 2 years. Mom is happy.
Sergo Yakh, 2014-08-29 Evaluation 5
- Cleans up well.
- Wheels could be bigger. But this is a niggle already.
The main dirt is collected in the cyclone. The bag is almost clean. Will be economical to operate. Sucks well, turbo brush works. In the house of dust with this vacuum cleaner was really less. Recommend!
Rudakov Vyacheslav, 2014-12-26 Evaluation 5
- Excellent winding inside your electric wire.
- Immediately burst hose (corrugation).
In general, not a vacuum cleaner, but junk! Old electrolux for 11 years, no problem. And this immediately kirdyk.
R454174 2015-03-14 Evaluation 2
- Powerful, does not require frequent replacement of expensive disposable bags, since the garbage remains in the cyclone, there is a turbo brush
- Not reusable bag, the tube falls out of the cyclone due to the absence of a latch
I bought recycling for the stock for 3770 rubles. An excellent vacuum cleaner is the best choice for the price — quality, no need to spend money on disposable bags and expensive filters!
Chesalin Vladimir, 2015-01-01 Evaluation 4